DBRaven

Architecture Structural Diff

Compare two scenarios node-by-node. See exactly which components, failure modes, and connections are shared, removed (−), or added (+) when switching from the left scenario to the right.

Select Scenarios to Diff

left, removals (−)

right, removals (−)

Two-Sided Marketplace PlatformAudit and Compliance Platform
17 removed+15 added7 unchanged

Components

19

Two-Sided Marketplace Platform

17

Audit and Compliance Platform

6 shared13+11

Failure Modes

5

Two-Sided Marketplace Platform

5

Audit and Compliance Platform

1 shared4+4

Connections

0

Two-Sided Marketplace Platform

0

Audit and Compliance Platform

0 shared

Components

6 shared13 left only+11 right only
=
PostgreSQLprimary datastore
data management
=
Rediscache
acceleration
=
Apache Kafkaevent stream
async processing
=
Event Sourcingarchitecture pattern
application logic
=
Transactional Outbox Patternarchitecture pattern
application logic
=
Lock Contentionoperational risk
operational risk
Marketplace Mixedworkload
workload
Read-Heavy API Backendworkload
workload
Financial Transactionworkload
workload
Elasticsearchsupporting component
application logic
RabbitMQevent stream
async processing
Saga Patternarchitecture pattern
application logic
CQRS (Command Query Responsibility Segregation)architecture pattern
application logic
Cache-Asidearchitecture pattern
application logic
API Gatewayarchitecture pattern
application logic
Hot Partitionoperational risk
operational risk
Cascading Failureoperational risk
operational risk
Thundering Herd (Cache Stampede)operational risk
operational risk
Queue Backlog Accumulationoperational risk
operational risk
+
Write-Heavy Transactionalworkload
workload
+
Event Streamingworkload
workload
+
ClickHouseprimary datastore
data management
+
Change Data Capture via WALarchitecture pattern
application logic
+
Time Series Rolluparchitecture pattern
application logic
+
Index Tablearchitecture pattern
application logic
+
Read Replicaarchitecture pattern
application logic
+
WAL Saturationoperational risk
operational risk
+
Write Amplification Cascadeoperational risk
operational risk
+
Disk I/O Saturationoperational risk
operational risk
+
Replication Lag Cascadeoperational risk
operational risk

Failure Modes

1 shared4 left only+4 right only
=
Lock Contention0 nodes affected
high
Hot Partition1 nodes affected
highhigh
Cascading Failure0 nodes affected
highhigh
Thundering Herd (Cache Stampede)1 nodes affected
highhigh
Queue Backlog Accumulation0 nodes affected
highhigh
+
WAL Saturation1 nodes affected
highhigh
+
Write Amplification Cascade0 nodes affected
highhigh
+
Disk I/O Saturation0 nodes affected
highhigh
+
Replication Lag Cascade1 nodes affected
moderate

Connections

Six-Dimension Assessment

Structural comparison across complexity, risk, scalability, maturity, observability, and generator readiness.

expert complexity, 19 nodes, 0 edges, 5 risks, 2 simulation seeds

Complexity

Audit →

high complexity, 17 nodes, 0 edges, 5 risks, 3 simulation seeds

5 risks (top: high), 5 high/critical, 1 confirmed by simulation

Operational Risk

tie

5 risks (top: high), 5 high/critical, 1 confirmed by simulation

4 scaling thresholds, 3 migration paths, 6 advisor scaling signals

Scalability

← Two-Sided

4 scaling thresholds, 3 migration paths, 6 advisor scaling signals

Advisor assessment: Advanced; recommended team: Platform Engineering Team; 15 operational requirements

Operational Maturity

tie

Advisor assessment: Advanced; recommended team: Experienced Backend Team; 11 operational requirements

5 watched metrics, 7 observability recommendations, 2 simulation seeds

Observability

← Two-Sided

8 watched metrics, 6 observability recommendations, 3 simulation seeds

generator relevance documented; topology generation relevance noted; simulation relevance noted; 2 seeds with generator notes

Generator Readiness

depends

generator relevance documented; topology generation relevance noted; simulation relevance noted; 3 seeds with generator notes