DBRaven

Architecture Structural Diff

Compare two scenarios node-by-node. See exactly which components, failure modes, and connections are shared, removed (−), or added (+) when switching from the left scenario to the right.

Select Scenarios to Diff

left, removals (−)

right, removals (−)

Social Feed PlatformStreaming Media Platform
11 removed+15 added12 unchanged

Components

18

Social Feed Platform

21

Streaming Media Platform

9 shared9+12

Failure Modes

5

Social Feed Platform

6

Streaming Media Platform

3 shared2+3

Connections

0

Social Feed Platform

0

Streaming Media Platform

0 shared

Components

9 shared9 left only+12 right only
=
Read-Heavy API Backendworkload
workload
=
Event Streamingworkload
workload
=
PostgreSQLprimary datastore
data management
=
Rediscache
acceleration
=
Apache Kafkaevent stream
async processing
=
Cache-Asidearchitecture pattern
application logic
=
Thundering Herd (Cache Stampede)operational risk
operational risk
=
Queue Backlog Accumulationoperational risk
operational risk
=
Hot Partitionoperational risk
operational risk
Write-Heavy Transactionalworkload
workload
RabbitMQevent stream
async processing
Fan-Out on Writearchitecture pattern
application logic
Fan-Out on Readarchitecture pattern
application logic
Transactional Outbox Patternarchitecture pattern
application logic
Publisher-Subscriberarchitecture pattern
application logic
Read Replicaarchitecture pattern
application logic
Fanout Amplificationoperational risk
operational risk
Replication Lag Cascadeoperational risk
operational risk
+
Batch ETL Pipelineworkload
workload
+
Time-Series Metricsworkload
workload
+
Apache Cassandraprimary datastore
data management
+
MinIOsupporting component
application logic
+
Competing Consumersarchitecture pattern
application logic
+
Event Sourcingarchitecture pattern
application logic
+
Change Data Capture via WALarchitecture pattern
application logic
+
Backpressurearchitecture pattern
application logic
+
Rate Limitingarchitecture pattern
application logic
+
Disk I/O Saturationoperational risk
operational risk
+
Slow Consumeroperational risk
operational risk
+
Cascading Failureoperational risk
operational risk

Failure Modes

3 shared2 left only+3 right only
=
Thundering Herd (Cache Stampede)1 nodes affected
high
=
Queue Backlog Accumulation1 nodes affected
high
=
Hot Partition0 nodes affected
high
Fanout Amplification1 nodes affected
moderate
Replication Lag Cascade1 nodes affected
moderate
+
Disk I/O Saturation1 nodes affected
highhigh
+
Slow Consumer0 nodes affected
moderate
+
Cascading Failure0 nodes affected
highhigh

Connections

Six-Dimension Assessment

Structural comparison across complexity, risk, scalability, maturity, observability, and generator readiness.

high complexity, 18 nodes, 0 edges, 5 risks, 4 simulation seeds

Complexity

← Social

high complexity, 21 nodes, 0 edges, 6 risks, 3 simulation seeds

5 risks (top: high), 4 high/critical, 1 confirmed by simulation

Operational Risk

← Social

6 risks (top: high), 5 high/critical, 0 confirmed by simulation

4 scaling thresholds, 3 migration paths, 6 advisor scaling signals

Scalability

← Social

4 scaling thresholds, 3 migration paths, 4 advisor scaling signals

Advisor assessment: Advanced; recommended team: Experienced Backend Team; 12 operational requirements

Operational Maturity

tie

Advisor assessment: Advanced; recommended team: Experienced Backend Team; 14 operational requirements

12 watched metrics, 6 observability recommendations, 4 simulation seeds

Observability

Streaming →

8 watched metrics, 7 observability recommendations, 3 simulation seeds

generator relevance documented; topology generation relevance noted; simulation relevance noted; 4 seeds with generator notes

Generator Readiness

depends

generator relevance documented; topology generation relevance noted; simulation relevance noted; 3 seeds with generator notes